<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolverine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://10moviestosee.com/2009/05/18/wolverine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://10moviestosee.com/2009/05/18/wolverine/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 01:47:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: May Movie Wap Up &#124; 10 Movies to See Before You Die</title>
		<link>http://10moviestosee.com/2009/05/18/wolverine/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>May Movie Wap Up &#124; 10 Movies to See Before You Die</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10moviestosee.com/?p=771#comment-406</guid>
		<description>[...] X-Men Origins: Wolverine - Mired in issues, leaks, studio involvement and development issues, I thought that it turned out pretty well. The much anticipated origin story of Wolverine - the one character Marvel has chosen to focus on from X-Men - came the movie most people thought they should have made after the first X-Men. Despite significant technical issues, the movie still stood on what it should have stood on - its story. A story that, while relatively new to the Marvel Universe and pissed off most extreme fanboys, was an excellent character study made perfectly for telling an origin. Bottom Line: Mostly Awesome. Original review here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] X-Men Origins: Wolverine &#8211; Mired in issues, leaks, studio involvement and development issues, I thought that it turned out pretty well. The much anticipated origin story of Wolverine &#8211; the one character Marvel has chosen to focus on from X-Men &#8211; came the movie most people thought they should have made after the first X-Men. Despite significant technical issues, the movie still stood on what it should have stood on &#8211; its story. A story that, while relatively new to the Marvel Universe and pissed off most extreme fanboys, was an excellent character study made perfectly for telling an origin. Bottom Line: Mostly Awesome. Original review here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trista</title>
		<link>http://10moviestosee.com/2009/05/18/wolverine/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Trista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 10:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10moviestosee.com/?p=771#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Yes, well, even Gavin Hood can beat The Rat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, well, even Gavin Hood can beat The Rat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selfstyler</title>
		<link>http://10moviestosee.com/2009/05/18/wolverine/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Selfstyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10moviestosee.com/?p=771#comment-362</guid>
		<description>I had a blast with Wolverine, and was very relieved it wasn&#039;t the dire, lkegacy betraying crapfest that X-Men 3 was.  Sure, there are things I would have liked to have seen done different, but not to the same extent as X3, and the good far outweighed the bad for me.

But of courser - it was no Star Trek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a blast with Wolverine, and was very relieved it wasn&#8217;t the dire, lkegacy betraying crapfest that X-Men 3 was.  Sure, there are things I would have liked to have seen done different, but not to the same extent as X3, and the good far outweighed the bad for me.</p>
<p>But of courser &#8211; it was no Star Trek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trista</title>
		<link>http://10moviestosee.com/2009/05/18/wolverine/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Trista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10moviestosee.com/?p=771#comment-355</guid>
		<description>I have totally seen Start Trek, I just don&#039;t know what to say about it, which is why I haven&#039;t reviewed it yet. A review filled with &quot;OMG! It&#039;s SOOOOOOOO good!!!&quot; would be fun, but not so much what my readers are looking for I think. Unfortunately, like I said, the movie is based on a book by the same name, which does only marginally more to explain the whole thing. Bottom line, he&#039;s a mutant and he&#039;s born like that. But I think the more important thing to focus on here is that the movie was actually titled &quot;X-MEN Origins: Wolverine&quot;. So really it&#039;s just an opportunity to introduce a whole bunch MORe characters that Marvel Studios thinks that you&#039;ll want to see. Trust me, even though they&#039;ve greenlit a Deadpool movie, I&#039;m not really interested. Not in the incarnation they&#039;ve given me... although they&#039;ll likely ret-con all that out.

On the Jackman front, I&#039;ll have to disagree. I never get tired of watching Hugh Jackman do anything... but then that&#039;s likely for a very different reason. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have totally seen Start Trek, I just don&#8217;t know what to say about it, which is why I haven&#8217;t reviewed it yet. A review filled with &#8220;OMG! It&#8217;s SOOOOOOOO good!!!&#8221; would be fun, but not so much what my readers are looking for I think. Unfortunately, like I said, the movie is based on a book by the same name, which does only marginally more to explain the whole thing. Bottom line, he&#8217;s a mutant and he&#8217;s born like that. But I think the more important thing to focus on here is that the movie was actually titled &#8220;X-MEN Origins: Wolverine&#8221;. So really it&#8217;s just an opportunity to introduce a whole bunch MORe characters that Marvel Studios thinks that you&#8217;ll want to see. Trust me, even though they&#8217;ve greenlit a Deadpool movie, I&#8217;m not really interested. Not in the incarnation they&#8217;ve given me&#8230; although they&#8217;ll likely ret-con all that out.</p>
<p>On the Jackman front, I&#8217;ll have to disagree. I never get tired of watching Hugh Jackman do anything&#8230; but then that&#8217;s likely for a very different reason. <img src='http://10moviestosee.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://10moviestosee.com/2009/05/18/wolverine/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10moviestosee.com/?p=771#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Well, while my opinions are also tainted by being somewhat of a comic book geek, I came to a different conclusion than you. The plot did not draw me in at all, and for a movie with Origins in the title it really didn&#039;t explain Wolverine&#039;s beginnings very well. Going to have to go straight to the source material for that. Also, I guess I was a bit annoyed with the liberties they took with some of the characters, especially Deadpool. The announced spin-off will supposedly be going back to his true character traits, though. I also agree that the CGI and action scenes left something to be desired.

What I do think was great was the casting and acting. Schreiber, Huston, Reynolds, and Kitsch were great in their supporting roles. Jackman...well, I think I&#039;m growing tired of his Wolverine, honestly. This is the fourth movie we&#039;ve seen him in after all.

Still, it was a good movie to sit back, watch, and not think too much about. It pretty much met my expectations, which weren&#039;t that high to begin with. Hopefully you&#039;ve seen Star Trek to experience the first real blockbuster of the summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, while my opinions are also tainted by being somewhat of a comic book geek, I came to a different conclusion than you. The plot did not draw me in at all, and for a movie with Origins in the title it really didn&#8217;t explain Wolverine&#8217;s beginnings very well. Going to have to go straight to the source material for that. Also, I guess I was a bit annoyed with the liberties they took with some of the characters, especially Deadpool. The announced spin-off will supposedly be going back to his true character traits, though. I also agree that the CGI and action scenes left something to be desired.</p>
<p>What I do think was great was the casting and acting. Schreiber, Huston, Reynolds, and Kitsch were great in their supporting roles. Jackman&#8230;well, I think I&#8217;m growing tired of his Wolverine, honestly. This is the fourth movie we&#8217;ve seen him in after all.</p>
<p>Still, it was a good movie to sit back, watch, and not think too much about. It pretty much met my expectations, which weren&#8217;t that high to begin with. Hopefully you&#8217;ve seen Star Trek to experience the first real blockbuster of the summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

