Where the Wild Things Are is a very complex movie, filled with highs and lows, darkness and light, reality and fantasy and wraps all of these concepts together in a way that feels so close to actual childhood that it viscerally cuts the audience down to their most basic elements. From the moment the trailer premiered it was clear that from a short, largely graphical children’s book, Spike Jonze and David Eggers were able to distill the essence of childhood and recreate the awkwardness, imagination, wonder, anger and joy that comes with trying to find your way in a world you are only coming to understand. Where the Wild Things Are is an unmitigated success and in unquestionably one of the best films of the year.
Where the Wild Things Are is the story of Max, a 10 year old boy, who lives with his sister and mother. One night while he is trying to garner the attention of his mother away from her boyfriend, he goes too far and bites her. Seeing that he’s upset her he flees the house into an empty lot in his neighbourhood. There he finds a boat that takes him to an island inhabited with some very large, very ugly, very aggressive creatures. Quickly becoming their King, Max begins to realize that things are not always as they seem, everything can’t be solved simply because you want it to and that no one has all the answers.
It is difficult to highlight all of the incredible things about this movie. Everything from the way every character is complete, even if only on screen for moments to the digital effects was excellent, seamless and only added to the overall effect the story had on its viewers – and the effect was not insignificant. Throughout the theatre there were stares of wonder, bursts of laughter and gasps of incredulity. Following Max, a boy trying to find his way into a new age and a new understanding of his world, is probably the most realistic representation of childhood ever put on screen. It’s so raw, so simplistic, so unwavering in its view that it’s almost uncomfortable. Max isn’t a good boy, but also not a bad one and the facets of the human character as it evolves are discussed in detail, always with a gentle and understanding eye. The film is shot almost entirely from Max’s viewpoint and the camera is always at his level, never looking down.
Much of the film’s strength comes from the complexity of the Wild Things themselves, which was achieved through a mix of physical effects and costumes and digital. In a sense, this film has shown us the very best of what digital has to offer, used in an enhancing, nuanced way and never in place of a physical effect. Enhanced brilliantly by the incredible voice talent in this film, none of the Wild Things are the cartoon-y throw away characters that you find in most children’s movies today. In this way it allows for the exploration of Max’s imagination that still seems real and remains something the viewer can really sink their teeth into.
Despite countless other attributes the film’s greatest attribute is Max himself. Played by 13 year-old Max Records, who was only 9 when the film was shot, Max is a full and complete character, with all the complexities of an actual child. So often in film we distill children down to their adorable, white-washed, innocence clearly forgetting that when we were that age we were actually human too. In fact, the many flaws in Max’s character are the most interesting part of the film, which clearly came out of Jonze’s understanding that in order to get a great performance out of a child you need to let them be one. It’s this unwavering eye that is actually the main source of criticism from the critics, many saying that the ending gets too dark for many children. I disagree. It’s the fact that so many of our children’s movies are candy-coated distillations of anything that a child might actually encounter in life designed only to make them feel good about themselves rather than to show them anything that might actually approximate reality. Where the Wild Things Are does not suffer from the need to pander.
Where the Wild Things Are is, despite all possible cliches from this declaration, an instant classic. It’s a must-see and, if you can, take a child or two with you. They’ll find their inner adult, while you connect with your inner child.



{ 1 trackback }
{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }
goddamn you write well. I liked this movie too.
Thanks Andrew! Thanks for following. I appreciate the compliments.
Hi Trista, I’m hosting the My Best Post blog-a-thon. It goes from May 21st-23rd.
Want to know the best part? You’ve already written your entry.
Just send me a link to your best/favorite/underrated blog post! Thanks!
http://he-shot-cyrus.blogspot.com/2010/04/big-announcement-revealed.html
Nice review.
Thought you might like these ranked lists of Animated Films on Rankography
http://www.rankography.com/movies/index.php?option=com_user&task=otherusers&mode=list&catid=27&uid=70
I do like the movie “Where The Wild Things Are”, cause it all looks similar to the books by Maurice Sendak and Dave Eggers, and that they both did wonderful jobs for the movie, including Spike Jonze, Max Records, Tom Hanks, Catherine Keener, James Gandolfini, and many more as well.
I do like the scenes that has to do with Carol and Max, cause James Gandolfini and Max Records have a very good friendship whenever they’re playing their characters for all scenes, cause I see James Gandolfini acting as the voice of Carol, and acting like a father figure to Max, and I also see Max Records acting as his character name Max and acting like a son figure to Carol.
I am hoping there’s going to be a sequel to this film, so everyone wants to know on what will happen to Max, if he’s going back to the island of the Wild Things or not, and what will happen to Carol, if he’s going to have a chance to apologize to Max for trying to eat him, and for what he has done to scared Max off, and if Carol wants to see Max again on his island, along with KW (voiced by Lauren Ambrose, and still a girlfriend to Carol, married and have a baby girl wild thing) and the other Wild Things with him to go see Max on his island on a BIG boat that Carol will built all by himself and that he’s going to see Max no matter what. Maybe bring James Gandolfini as Carol, Lauren Ambrose as KW, Catherine O’Hara as Judith, Forest Whitaker as Ira, Chris Cooper as Douglas, Michael Berry, Jr. as the Bull, Paul Dano as Alexander, Max Records as Max and Catherine Keener as Max’s mother, and the girl that played Max’s older sister name Claire. Maybe let the Bull talk and maybe a scene or two with the Bull and Claire, and a few scenes with Carol and Max, and also with Carol and Max’s mother. Maybe let Carol be a father to Max, and Max be a son to Carol. (What do you guys think for a sequel?)
Do you guys think there’s going to be a sequel to this film? If so, what will happen to Max, and what will happen to the Wild Things, especially Carol?
Thank you.
Hello Trista,
Just found your blog link over at http://detailedcriticisms.blogspot.com/ and wanted to pop over and say hello. I started my movie-review blog back in May and have been steadily building my reviews and circle of fellow reviewers and readers. It’s amazing how quickly you can follow one link to a site to another, to another, and before long you’ve spent the whole morning networking. Of course I’d like to invite you over to my site if you see fit.
I picked this review mainly because I have a complete opposite opinion of it. Of course I grew up with the original book and over the years decided I had my own personal take on the story and characters and was initially excited at the prospect of a feature film version. I think what made the original so successful and inviting was the sparsity of the story (the original has only 10 sentences in it) and how it invited the reader into the fantastical world created by the box, Max. I was initially excited that Spike Jonze was attached but quite honestly I found the blending of live-action, puppetry and CGI far more unrewarding than you did. I was also alarmed that the project percolated so long, which often these kinds of odd films do, and equally disheartened when I learned that the studio meddled in Jonze’s “first cut”. That always spells disaster to me. I just reviewed Jonah Hex (2010) which was very nearly a disaster, due in part to the studio meddling with the film because they felt it should be something the filmmaker didn’t make.
I think what actually failed for me the most was the interpretation and realization of young Max who just seemed entirely too angry and muddled a character (age not withstanding). And the ending felt particularly dark and cynical – perhaps where the Jonze the “man” met Jonze the “boy” met their creative differences.
I know you like and write about the way Jonze explores the complexity of children and the believable, and often confusing emotions going on in them, but I actually felt a little disturbed by what I perceived as violence – clearly not the ‘mischief’ that Sendak created in his 1963 picture book.
Glad to have stumbled your way.
cheers->
Rory
Above the Line: Practical Movie Reviews
O.K. so I had no intention of writing of a review for this film until I stumbled on your site and then pop, I got distracted from all the other stuff I was supposed to be doing, a voila! If you’re interested drop by my site and have a read.
cheers->
rory
.-= Rory Dean´s last blog post ..I Am Love 2010 =-.
You write really well. I have never see this movie. Maybe after reading your blog I will.
Very interesting movie, I like it very much. You write very good
.-= Cosmin Cornea´s last blog post ..Album digital botez =-.
Great read. Am I the only one that thought the dog was a little too much? Kind of took me out of the movie for a bit.
.-= Joseph´s last blog post ..Fake Criterion Posters =-.
I have not seen this movie
but reading this article I want to see
ty